HOME > The ability to

Victorious in the Supreme Court, Renan slams Marco Aurélio

Senate President Renan Calheiros (PMDB-AL) says that Supreme Court Justice Marco Aurélio Mello, who ordered his removal from office through a preliminary injunction, "with these clumsy decisions, will end up going down in history through the back door"; he says he disagrees that he disregarded a Supreme Court injunction by refusing to receive the court officer with the summons; "I don't agree. The [Senate] board decided otherwise – and there was nothing to do but follow that decision."

Senate President Renan Calheiros (PMDB-AL) says that Supreme Court Justice Marco Aurélio Mello, who ordered his removal from office by preliminary injunction, "with these clumsy decisions, will end up going down in history through the back door"; he says he disagrees that he disregarded a Supreme Court injunction by refusing to receive the court officer with the summons; "I don't agree. The [Senate] board decided otherwise – and there was nothing to do but follow that decision" (Photo: Gisele Federicce)

247 - Having won a Supreme Federal Court (STF) ruling that decided he should remain president of the Senate, Renan Calheiros (PMDB-AL) harshly criticized the minister who issued the injunction that removed him, Marco Aurélio Mello, in an interview with journalist Luiz Maklouf Carvalho, from the newspaper O Estado de S.Paulo.

According to Renan, "with these clumsy decisions, he will end up going down in history through the back door." Regarding the injunction, Renan opined: "absolutely hasty. With an accusation of embezzlement where there isn't even a court ruling, against the president of a branch of government that has sought to maintain the Senate on a level of responsibility and balance."

Marco Aurélio made the decision to remove Renan from office based on the trial that made him a defendant for embezzlement. After being defeated in the plenary session, the minister appealed to his colleagues and harshly criticized Renan. "That was a desperate move," commented the senator. "I didn't quite understand Marco Aurélio," he added.

The senator also says he disagrees that he disregarded a Supreme Court injunction by refusing to receive the court officer with the summons on two occasions. "I don't agree. The [Senate] board decided otherwise – and there was nothing to do but follow that decision," he said.