Without evidence, but with "conviction": Federal Police want to extend investigation into Lula and Dilma.
"It's a conviction and therefore doesn't require proof, like that recording already considered illegal by the Supreme Court, ordered to be released by Sérgio Moro but which, since he is a judge above the law, came to nothing. The Brazilian police-judicial apparatus has become a shameful tool for political persecution. Facts are not investigated; evidence – or something slightly similar to it – is sought to confirm opinions," writes journalist Fernando Brito, from Tijolaço.
By Fernando Brito, from brick The website Jot It is noted that the Federal Police are requesting "more time" from the Supreme Federal Court for their investigations into alleged "obstruction of justice" in Dilma Rousseff's appointment of former President Lula as Chief of Staff of the government. This request is supported by the Attorney General's Office.
The website states that "for prosecutors, Lula's appointment to the Chief of Staff position was part of the actions taken by the Presidential Palace to 'disrupt' the investigation into the Petrobras corruption scheme and to remove Judge Sergio Moro from leading the investigations involving Lula, thus guaranteeing him the right to privileged jurisdiction."
It is a conviction and therefore does not require proof, like that recording already deemed illegal by the Supreme Federal Court, ordered to be released by Sérgio Moro but which, since he is a judge above the law, came to nothing.
The Brazilian police and judicial system has become a shameful tool for political persecution. Instead of investigating the facts, they seek evidence – or something vaguely resembling it – to confirm opinions.
Just like Donald Trump asked today."Are we in Nazi Germany?"