I live in a campaign.

"I see only one thing"

Rosangela Moro.

Rosângela Wolff Moro, wife of former Minister of Justice and Public Security Sergio Moro, said she sees no separation between her husband and Bolsonaro. “I am pro-federal government. I don't see Bolsonaro as separate from Sergio Moro. I see Sergio Moro as part of President Jair Bolsonaro's government; I see one and the same.”  

This statement was given in an interview published in the newspaper O Estado de S. Paulo in February of this year. Who are we to disagree...?

Every move and every word of the Maringá duck is carefully considered to convince the unwary that he is "the man," but unfortunately, only time will reveal who Sergio Fernando Moro really is and what he's all about. I hope it's not too late.

The fact is that Moro corrupted and manipulated the constitution, the law, and public opinion, all in the name of a personal power project and in service of interests that will be revealed in time.

Moro betrayed the judiciary, committed malfeasance while heading the Ministry of Justice (when he delayed and failed to promptly perform an official act, namely: denouncing the president's pressure on the Federal Police), and only denounced Bolsonaro to satisfy personal interests or feelings, and furthermore: he betrayed the trust of the one who appointed him minister, all in the name of his personal project, all meticulously planned. 

But let's get to the main point: Moro resigned simply because he felt Bolsonaro was hindering his objectives, and this move triggered a crisis that caused the stock market to crash, the dollar to skyrocket, and could remove Bolsonaro from office. But that doesn't matter to Moro; his commitment isn't to Brazil.

He resigned and, in the same scene, launched his candidacy for president of the republic, slogan and all.

For those who think Sergio Fernando Moro is a "good guy," I suggest they observe that he even has a pre-campaign slogan: "Do the right thing, for the right reasons, and in the right way," presumably with public money. The fact that Moro is using the above slogan on his Twitter account may constitute the use of public money for personal purposes, making his conduct fit the provisions of Article 9, paragraphs IV, VI, and XII of the Administrative Improbity Law, since, in one way or another, he is benefiting from it. 

In 2017 I asked here on 247 if it would be "Moro, the Empire's puppet?", the truth is that Moro is not just a puppet, he is the representative of interests to be revealed, but they are not national interests.

One point to note: I have never opposed the operations, which are so necessary, of the police, especially the Federal Police, but my reflection has always been about understanding the "whys" of everything that occurred and the way it was done, its true causes and the immediate and long-term consequences.

Our obligation is to support all actions of a republican nature that represent a step forward in the permanent construction of our nation, but according to our own "script" and to serve national interests, Moro and the Golden Boys of the Federal Public Prosecutor's Office professed certainties from overseas, as if Brazil were a colony of the American empire and, with the support of the corporate media, prevented a large part of the population from maintaining a critical view of the events that occurred from 2013 onwards, placing the common good, social justice, and human and economic development in a secondary position.

Moro declared that he didn't get rich, so I ask: who will pay his bills? Perhaps we can find answers in the book "Who Paid the Bill?", by the British historian Frances Stonor Saunders, which I have already cited here on 247.

In the book, she presents the thesis that the instrumentalization of "culture" was one of the mechanisms of domination and power wielded by the United States over artists and intellectuals worldwide during the Cold War; foundations and the US State Department funded all those who undertook to work as multipliers of the empire's liberal vision.

We know that domination still occurs, and in other forms, such as the control of the media, arts, and culture, which influence and dominate virtually all peoples, especially in the West, etc. I think that Moro, Janot, and the Lava Jato prosecutors have been domesticated and are dominated by the American way of life; all of them, from what I've read, studied at American universities and are frequently there.

The intellectual Luiz Alberto de Vianna Moniz Bandeira, in a recent interview, citing the historian John Coatsworth, said that between 1898 and 1994, the United States sponsored 41 successful coups d'état in Latin America to change regimes, "which is equivalent to the overthrow of a government every 28 months, in a century," an irrefutable proof that in the land of the brave there is no love for democracy. 

After 1994, other methods, not military ones, were used to remove the governments of Honduras (2009), Paraguay (2012) and Brazil (2016).

In this context, the shadowy figure of first-instance judge Sérgio Moro enters the scene, leading the proceedings against Petrobras and the major national construction companies. 

Moro, subservient and docile to US interests, prepared himself for the missions entrusted to him since 2007, in courses promoted by the US State Department; he continued in 2008, when he participated in a special training program at Harvard Law School, together with his colleague Gisele Lemke, and in October 2009, he also participated in the regional conference on "Illicit Financial Crimes", promoted in Rio de Janeiro by the United States Embassy.

It is known that the National Security Agency (NSA), which monitored Petrobras' communications, discovered irregularities and corruption involving some members of the Workers' Party (PT), and it is speculated that it provided data on the money launderer Alberto Yousseff to Judge Sérgio Moro, who was already trained in multi-jurisdictional action and investigative practices, including real-life demonstrations (such as preparing witnesses to denounce third parties).

But what about the effects of Lava Jato and Moro? As an example of the "services" provided by Moro, one can cite the loss of 140 billion reais in the national GDP in 2015 alone; Moniz Bandeira, to whom I pay homage with this article, explains all this well.

Today we have Moro as a pre-candidate for the presidency of the republic.